<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Declaratory Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edsalert.com/2008/03/17/2007-trs-cost-recovery-declaratory-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edsalert.com/2008/03/17/2007-trs-cost-recovery-declaratory-ruling/</link>
	<description>POSTS ALERTS REGARDING TRS &#38; ITS RELATED ISSUES</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: edsalert</title>
		<link>http://www.edsalert.com/2008/03/17/2007-trs-cost-recovery-declaratory-ruling/#comment-22733</link>
		<dc:creator>edsalert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edsalert.com/2008/03/17/2007-trs-cost-recovery-declaratory-ruling/#comment-22733</guid>
		<description>That is a good question.  According to the section 89 thru 94, it seems that any VRS providers giving dollars to state associations of the deaf as long as VRS minutes are generated are illegal.   However, that is for the FCC - actually Enforcement Bureau, a branch of the FCC - to decide if CSDVRS violated any or not.   

So far the FCC has not taken any action.  So to answer your question, will that be allowed to continue is dependent on the FCC and if they act on it or not.  If no action, then the assumption is that CSDVRS or any VRS providers will be allowed to continue the practice because the FCC has not taken any action.

eyes open &#038; thumbs up,

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good question.  According to the section 89 thru 94, it seems that any VRS providers giving dollars to state associations of the deaf as long as VRS minutes are generated are illegal.   However, that is for the FCC - actually Enforcement Bureau, a branch of the FCC - to decide if CSDVRS violated any or not.   </p>
<p>So far the FCC has not taken any action.  So to answer your question, will that be allowed to continue is dependent on the FCC and if they act on it or not.  If no action, then the assumption is that CSDVRS or any VRS providers will be allowed to continue the practice because the FCC has not taken any action.</p>
<p>eyes open &#038; thumbs up,</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puzzled</title>
		<link>http://www.edsalert.com/2008/03/17/2007-trs-cost-recovery-declaratory-ruling/#comment-22688</link>
		<dc:creator>Puzzled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edsalert.com/2008/03/17/2007-trs-cost-recovery-declaratory-ruling/#comment-22688</guid>
		<description>Hmm interesting...  How would this impact the ongoing CSDVRS giving dollars to state associations of the deaf?  Will that be allowed to continue?

Thanks and keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm interesting&#8230;  How would this impact the ongoing CSDVRS giving dollars to state associations of the deaf?  Will that be allowed to continue?</p>
<p>Thanks and keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
