Net Neutrality
16 10 2010Discriminating Folks,
Net Neutrality is an explosive issue right now. Underlying issue is simply should Internet be regulated or continue unregulated? Which of these two is best to preserve the Open Internet? Should Internet providers be allowed to give preference to those people who pays the highest monthly rate? Or the other way around, should Internet providers be allowed to block heavy users of Internet?
These are just questions out of many in the NPRM that the FCC is asking Public and Industry. Lot of industry responded: I counted so far 75 have responded. NPRM is bit long, but not too difficult to read and understand.
Quotable Quotes:
The underlying purpose is: "In order to promote innovation, investment, competition, and free expression, and to protect and empower consumers.."
and also this: "..that would codify the Internet Policy Statement’s four principles and strengthen them by prohibiting broadband Internet access providers from treating lawful traffic in a discriminatory manner, and by requiring providers to be transparent regarding their network management practices."
Reason for NPRM seems to be that:
"The discussion generated by the Commission’s Open Internet proceeding appears to have narrowed disagreement on many of the key elements of the framework proposed in the NPRM:
First, that broadband providers should not prevent users from sending and receiving the lawful content of their choice, using the lawful applications and services of their choice, and connecting the nonharmful devices of their choice to the network, at least on fixed or wireline broadband platforms.
Second, that broadband providers should be transparent regarding their network management practices.
Third, that with respect to the handling of lawful traffic, some form of anti-discrimination protection is appropriate, at least on fixed or wireline broadband platforms.
Fourth, that broadband providers must be able to reasonably manage their networks, including through appropriate and tailored mechanisms that reduce the effects of congestion or address traffic that is unwanted by users or harmful to the network.
Fifth, that in light of rapid technological and market change, enforcing high-level rules of the road through case-by-case adjudication, informed by engineering expertise, is a better policy approach than promulgating detailed, prescriptive rules that may have consequences that are difficult to foresee."
There are lot more analytical remarks from the FCC. If you are interested, read on. However, Net Neutrality issue is what will determine how we, the users of Internet, be able to use Internet and to what extent and what we’re not allowed to.
Unless I overlooked, I do not see any comments from deaf/hoh groups that commented. I know that this is generally for industry, but Internet Users or non-profit/advocacy organizations certainly can comment. I see many did like one from Hispanic group, etc.
eyes open & thumbs up,
Ed
Open Internet Long Link: https://prodnet.www.neca.org/publicationsdocs/wwpdf/da101667.pdf
(For those who wants to know what "discriminating" means: with "ing" and used before noun, it becomes adjective and means a person having or showing refined taste or good judgment. I mention that cuz discriminate (verb) can be conveyed as a negative term.)
Categories : Alerts, Digress to Other Issues, FCC Issues

Recent Comments